Valley Personal Papers


Return to Browse | Return to Search

Bibliographic Information | Modern-Spelling Version

Franklin County: Edward McPherson to [unknown], October 18, 1860

Summary:
Edward McPherson responds to an incorrect rumor linking him in a conversation with Judge Stephen Douglas. McPherson explains that he only overheard Douglas in a conversation with someone else.


Oct. 18/60-

Gettysburg (Pa)

Dear Sir --

Your letter of 16th inst., gave me the first information I received on the subject to which it refers.-- It greatly surprised me to find my name connected with an arraignment of Judge Douglas, and to observe the manner in which it has occurred. I am very unwilling to be involved in the contest now going on between rival interests in the Democratic party, but the publicity [deleted: attached to the affair] given it, & your request, appear to make it proper for me to [deleted: write the delegate] state a few words of explanation.

I had a conversation with Alfred E. Lewis, Esq., on the [deleted: street] public square in Gettysburg, recently after my return from Wa in June. It was casual, hurried & brief. It was also unreserved, as is the intercourse between personal friends--- It was [added: also] made without the slightest idea that

[page 2]
it wd. ever [unclear: read] the public [added: & be used as a political lever].-- In that conversation I alluded to the probabilities of W. [illeg.] [illeg.] the people, to the [unclear: ultimate] possible co-operation of some of the Douglas men, and to the preferences of Judge Douglas himself.-- In this connexion I made the remark which he either misapprehended, or inaccurately remembered.-- This brings me to the leading point.--

I never had a conversation with Judge Douglas on politics.-- At Sen. Carr's party, [added: however,] on the Evening of May 18, I was standing in the refreshment-room with friends, in the immediate vicinity of Judge Douglas who was in Earnest & [illeg.] conversation with an officer of the Army or Navy, whose name I do not know.-- I was [added: first] attracted by the [illeg.] of the Judge's manner [deleted: and the]. He was replying to a question concerning the [added: then recent] nomination of Mr. Lincoln [deleted: then recent], whom the Judge [added: referred to in compelling terms,] & the strength of whose nomination he freely [illeg.]. The conversation soon turned on the condition of the Sen. party, its rememberment of Charleston,

[page 3]
& its future.-- Among other points, was the probability of the election going to the House -- Judge Douglas said with great positiveness, that it never would go to the House, & that, if necessary, the NorthWest could be a [unclear: writ] to present it.-- The inference I drew was that it wd [added: ready] be a writ for Lincoln, as [added: neither he nor any one else could possibly hope to do or [illeg.] [illeg.]] he could not make it it a writ for any other candidate.

At the same time, the Juge made some heated remarks about the Southern ultras, whose course had deprived him of the nomination at Charleston, & who threatened to fight him to the bitter end. He said, & repeated it with emphasis and marked gesture, that he wd. rather see a "Free Nigger" Pres-t. than one of them.--

The Judge's remarks were not such as would easily be forgotten, & they impressed themselves upon my memory.-- I mentioned the incident to but few persons, & scarcely ever in detail.-- [deleted: I alluded to it in a general way to Mr. Lewis, as we of the [illeg.] that time, I have had little doubt that there wd. be an election of the people, or that Abraham Lincoln wd. be chosen.--]

[page 4]
I give it now, because it appears to be of some importance that I shd state [deleted: precisely] [added: (as you request)] precisely the facts.--

I have the honor to be

yours ty

Edwd McPherson



Return to Full Valley Archive